Grissom v. White et al
| Wesley Elisha Grissom |
| Latricia White, James Gibson, Kay Howell and Amanda McClain |
| 5:2013cv00024 |
| January 28, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Chicot |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
157
JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendant Latricia White and against plaintiff Wesley Elisha Grissom. The relief requested is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/09/2015. (rhm)
|
|
Filing
146
ORDER. The Court conducted a pretrial hearing on 9/28/2015 and grants in part and denies in part 123 Mr. Grissom's motion in limine and grants in part and denies in part 134 Ms. White's motion in limine. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/1/2015. (thd) (Docket text modified on 10/1/2015 to correct a typographical error.) (thd).
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER, the parties have not consented to proceed before a U. S. Magistrate Judge, and they have requested a jury trial; therefore, the Honorable Kristine G. Baker, U. S. District Judge, is notified that this action is ready to be set on her docket for a jury trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 09/17/2014. (kcs)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER adopting 92 94 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Dispositions in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 67 Motion for Summary Judgment. Wesley Elisha Grissom's claims against Ms. McClean are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; granting in part and denying in part 74 Motion for Summary Judgment. Mr. Grissom's claims against separate defendants James Gibson, Kay Howell, Grant Harris, Jada Lawr ence, and Wendy Kelley are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Mr. Grissom may proceed with his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 excessive force and pendent state law battery claims against separate defendant Latricia White. Mr. Grissom's request for monetary damages against Ms. White in her official capacity is dismissed with prejudice; denying 100 Motion for Ruling. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/8/2014. (ks)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER that the remainder of 60 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel filed by Wesley Elisha Grissom is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 01/15/2014. (kcs)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER denying, in part, 60 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel; denying 64 Plaintiff's Motion for Issuance of a Subpoena Duces Tecum. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 12/24/2013. (kcs)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND PARTIAL DISPOSITION 52 ; denying 41 Motion to Dismiss Party. The Clerk is directed to amend the docket sheet to reflect that defendant McLane is "Amanda McLean". Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/13/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING granting 5 Partial Report and Recommendations and finding as moot 14 Motion for Service. The Clerk is directed to prepare summons for defts White, Howell and Gibson. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, complaint, and this Order on them through the ADC Compliance Office without prepayment of fees. The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for deft McClain, and the U.S. Marshall is directed to serve her through the Humphries & Lewis Law Firm. The Court certifies that an ifp appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/1/13. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
