Van Horn v. Martin et al
| Yevonne Van Horn |
| Mark Martin and Darrell S Hedden |
| 5:2013cv00074 |
| March 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
JUDGMENT dismissing with prejudice the Amended Complaint, 14 . Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/3/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER suspending the Scheduling Order and trial in this case. Defendants' 45 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied without prejudice. The 51 Joint Motion to Extend Time is denied as moot. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/6/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying without prejudice 24 Motion to Dismiss all the retaliation claims. The 14 Amended Complaint is adequate as a matter of pleading on causation. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/5/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
23
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/28/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion to Dismiss; granting 9 Motion to Amend/Correct complaint, as modified. Van Horn must file an amended complaint by August 30, 2013. She must revise her proposed amended complaint to conform to the rulings in this Order. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/20/13. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
