Odum v. Hobbs et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 20, 2015
JUDGMENT: Odum's failure-to-protect claim against Hobbs, Banks, Page, and Meinzer and his retaliation claim against Hobbs are dismissed without prejudice. Odum's excessive force claim against Thrower and his retaliation claim against Thrower, Banks, Page, and Meinzer are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/20/2015. (jak)
|July 28, 2014
ORDER directing Plaintiff to file within 30 days a Response to 40 through 43 that comply with the Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, Local Rule 56.1, and the instructions set forth in this Order; Plaintiff is advised that failure to timely and properly comply with this Order will result in: (a) all facts in 40 being deemed admitted by Plaintiff; or (b) the dismissal of this action, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 07/28/2014. (kcs)
|October 8, 2013
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summons on defendants Hobbs, Banks, Page, Meinzer, and Thrower. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, complaint, amended complaint and this Order on defendants without prepayment of fees therefore. The 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied. An in forma pauperis appeal of any portion of this Order would notbe taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/8/13. (kpr)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?