Roberts v. BeBee et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 27, 2015
ORDER ADOPTING 83 the recommended disposition; granting 47 the Defendants' motion for summary judgment; dismissing the case, with prejudice; denying 67 Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment; and certifying than in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/27/2015. (kdr)
|November 6, 2014
ORDER ADOPTING 36 the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition; granting 22 defendants' motion for partial summary judgment; dismissing, without prejudice, all of Roberts's claims against Maroney; dismissing, without preju dice, Roberts's racial discrimination claims against Jackson, Sumner, and Lester; allowing Roberts to proceed with his: (a) racial discrimination claims against Hobbs, Evans, and May; and (b) retaliation claims against Hobbs, Evans, May, Jackson, Sumner, and Lester; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/6/2014. (kdr)
|September 16, 2014
ORDER directing the Defendants to file within 7 days of the entry of this Order, a Supplemental Brief that includes copies of the entire administrative record for grievances MX13-1077, MX13-1340, MX13-1865, and MX13-2400. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 09/16/2014. (kcs)
|February 19, 2014
INITIAL ORDER FOR pro se prisoners. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 02/19/2014. (kcs)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?