Stricklin v. Kittrell et al
| Joshua A Stricklin |
| K Bowman, R Mehta, Albert Kittrell, M Rector, Shawn Richard and Wendy Kelley |
| 5:2014cv00092 |
| March 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| Beth Deere |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
JUDGMENT dismissing with prejudice the claims against Kittrell and Bowman. The claims against Mehta, Rector, Richard, and Kelley are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/27/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER adopting 41 PARTIAL RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION. Stricklin's claims against Bowman are dismissed with prejudice. Stricklin should provide the Court with an updated address by 21 August 2014 or his complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/1/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER adopting as modified 25 Partial Recommended Disposition. Stricklin's claims against Kittrell are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/3/2014. (jak)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER allowing plaintiff sixty (60) days from the date of this Order to find a valid service address for Dr. Mehta and to file a "Motion for Service" so that service can be attempted upon Dr. Mehta at a valid address.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 06/30/2014. (plm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
