Morrow v. Lay et al
Plaintiff:
Berry Morrow
Defendant:
Gaylon Lay, Tate, J Kirtley and Larry May
Case Number:
5:2014cv00152
Filed:
April 22, 2014
Court:
Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office:
Pine Bluff Office
County:
Jefferson
Presiding Judge:
Brian S. Miller
Referring Judge:
H. David Young
Nature of Suit:
Prison Condition
Cause of Action:
42:1983
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| April 1, 2015 | 42 |
ORDER ADOPTING 41 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; dismissing Berry Morrow's complaint, with prejudice, with respect to the claim that his housing conditions amounted to cruel and unusual punishment; and dismissing the compl aint, without prejudice, with respect to Morrow's claims that his packages were stolen and he was discriminated against based on his religious beliefs for failure to exhaust administrative remedy. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/1/2015. (kdr)
|
| March 12, 2015 | 38 |
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety in all respects 35 proposed findings and partial recommended disposition; and denying 33 motion for injunctive relief. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/12/2015. (ljb)
|
| January 27, 2015 | 32 |
ORDER ADOPTING 28 the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition; and denying 21 the defendants' motion to dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/27/2014. (kdr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
