Schwarm v. Hubbard et al
| Brian Scott Schwarm |
| Connie Hubbard, William Kirk, James T Banks, Rory L Griffin and Ray Hobbs |
| 5:2014cv00276 |
| July 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Chicot |
| James M. Moody |
| H. David Young |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER ADOPTING 75 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. The 64 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Connie Hubbard and William Kirk is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to his claims ag ainst Hubbard and Kirk, and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in all other respects. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 4/15/2015. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER ADOPTING 57 Partial Report and Recommendations: The 45 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Banks, Griffin and Hobbs is GRANTED, and they are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and removed as party Defendants. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 3/2/2015. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER ADOPTING 52 Partial Report and Recommendations. The 26 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Connie Hubbard and William Kirk is DENIED. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 2/24/2015. (mcz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
