Morrow v. Matthews et al
| Berry Morrow |
| Shelia Matthews, Stanley Robinson, Kendrick Nelson, Maurice Williams, William Straughn, James Hamilton, Marvin Evans, Ray Hobbs, Doe, Terrie Banister, Raymond Naylor, Coleman, Artie Morris, Shine and Roshell |
| 5:2014cv00285 |
| July 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| James M. Moody |
| H. David Young |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER ADOPTING 40 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith; All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/14/2015. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING 24 Partial Report and Recommendations; Plaintiff's 21 Motion for Injunctive Relief is DENIED. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 3/2/2015. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING 5 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition: Plaintiff is allowed to proceed with his retaliation claims against Defendants Shelia Matthews, Stanley Robinson, Kendrick Nelson, Maurice Williams, Williams Straughn, and Marvin Evans; Plaintiff's claims against all other Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/27/2014. (mcz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
