Howell et al v. Kelly et al
Robert E Howell, Sr and Does |
Wendy Kelly, Marvin Evans, Jr, Marshall Dale Reed, Lay, Crystal Wood, Bland, Foote, Debra Goldmon, Knight, Justine Minor, Cherry, April Gibson and Lisa Renes Hall |
5:2015cv00316 |
October 7, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Lincoln |
Patricia S. Harris |
D. P. Marshall |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 71 order filed this date, judgment is entered dismissing this case without prejudice; the relief sought is denied. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 7/25/2017. (ljb) |
Filing 57 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 and 30 motions to dismiss. The motions to dismiss filed by Evans, Lay, Gleenover Knight, and Cherry, are granted to the extent that Howell's claims for monetary damages against Evans, Lay, and C herry, in their official capacity, are dismissed with prejudice, but denied in all other respects. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively terminate the 40 findings and recommendations entered on 12/16/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 2/24/2017. (ljb) |
Filing 44 ORDER adopting 37 Recommendation. 34 Motion granted. Howell's claims against Gleenover Knight are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/20/2016. (jak) |
Filing 12 ORDER adopting 10 Recommendation and overruling Howell's partial objections, 11 . Howell agrees to pare down his claims, but he still wants to cast a wider net than Rule 20 allows. Howell may proceed with his retaliation and cell-placement cl aims against Defendants Lay, Evans, Knight, and Cherry. Howell's claims against defendants Reed, Wood, Bland, Foote, Goldmon, Minor, Gibson, and Hall are dismissed without prejudice. If he wants to pursue those claims, then he must do so in separate lawsuits. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/1/2016. (jak) |
Filing 9 ORDER partly adopting the recommendation, 7 . The Doe Plaintiffs are dismissed without prejudice because Howell doesn't have standing to sue on their behalf. Howell's claim against Kelley is now moot and is therefore dismissed without prej udice. In light of this change, the Court declines the remainder of the recommendation, 7 , without prejudice and refers this case back to Magistrate Judge Harris to determine which of Howell's other claims, if any, should proceed. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/1/2016. (jak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.