Grant/Rakim v. Bland

Plaintiff: Abraham/Rasheen Grant/Rakim
Defendant: Bland
Case Number: 5:2015cv00327
Filed: October 14, 2015
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Pine Bluff Office
County: Lincoln
Presiding Judge: James M. Moody
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 3, 2015 4 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 3 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Should Plaintiff wish to continue this case, he shall submit the statutory $400 to the Clerk within 10 days from this Order, noting the case style and number, together with a motion to reopen the case. Plaintiff's 2 Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/3/2015. (mcz)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grant/Rakim v. Bland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abraham/Rasheen Grant/Rakim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?