Davis v. Jefferson Regional Medical Center Preferred Provider Organization et al
| Lee Andrew Davis |
| Jefferson Regional Medical Center Preferred Provider Organization, Walter Johnson, David Nixon and John Does |
| 5:2016cv00262 |
| August 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| Brian S. Miller |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
JUDGMENT: Dr. Davis's retaliation claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 is dismissed with prejudice. His Arkansas Civil Rights Act and Arkansas Freedom of Information Act claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/10/2017. (jak)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying without prejudice 7 Motion to Dismiss. The 23 Motion for Extension of Time is granted. Davis's response to the live 19 Motion to Dismiss is due by 11/17/2016. Davis's embedded motion to serve Walter Johnson by warning or der, 12 -1, is denied without prejudice. The Court attaches a recent fax from Davis's lawyer requesting service by warning order. No more faxes, please. Any request for Court action or relief should be filed. The 10 Initial Scheduling Order, is vacated. An Amended one will issue. The Court directs the Clerk to correct the name of lead defendant "Jefferson Hospital Organization, Inc." on the docket. The party is "Jefferson Hospital Association, Inc". Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/3/2016. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
