Baker v. James et al
| Lee Baker |
| David James, Powell and Trantaham |
| 5:2016cv00279 |
| September 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| Beth Deere |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER approving and adopting the 16 Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; granting in part and denying in part the defendants' 12 motion to dismiss; dismissing without prejudice Baker's deliberate-indifference claim; and instructing the Clerk to terminate defendant Powell as a part defendant. Baker may proceed on his retaliation claims against defendants Trantaham and James. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/8/2016. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summonses for Defendants James, Powell, and Trantaham through the Arkansas Department of Correction Compliance Division; directing the U.S. Marshal to serve copies of 2 Complaint and 6 Amended Complaint with any attachments and summonses for these Defendants without prepayment of fees, costs, or security; and directing the Clerk to terminate Defendant Griffin and the ADC as party Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 9/26/2016. (mef)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
