Woods v. Cook et al
| Demetrius Leki Woods |
| Pamela F Cook, J Byers, William Straughn and V R Robinson |
| 5:2017cv00023 |
| January 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER granting Mr. Woods' request for voluntary dismissal, but under the condition that if he chooses to refile this action, he must do so in this Court; dismissing this action without prejudice; and denying as moot all pending motions. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/31/2017. (mef)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER approving and adopting the 29 the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; directing the Clerk to amend the docket to reflect the full and correct names of defendants Jared Byers and Vernon Robertson; granting 23 Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment on exhaustion; dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff Demetrius Woods' claims against separate defendant Vernon Robertson for failure to exhaust administra tive remedies; denying at this time 23 at 2 Defendants' motion for an extension of time to file dispositive motions on the issue of exhaustion; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/13/2017. (mef)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
