Paxton v. McBride et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 12, 2018
ORDER Adopting 86 Report and Recommendations. Defendants' 59 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Plaintiff's remaining claims against Defendants McBride, Evans, Gray and Malone are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaus t administrative remedies. Plaintiff's cause of action is dismissed. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/12/2018. (mcz)
|January 30, 2018
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety 37 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; and denying 31 Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/30/2018. (ljb)
|January 17, 2018
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety the 22 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; allowing Plaintiff to proceed on his retaliatory discipline claims against Defendants Iris M cBride, Cory Evans, Michelle Gray, and S. Malone; dismissing from this action without prejudice Plaintiff's claims alleging denial of access to the courts; dismissing without prejudice Defendants Wendy Kelley and Michelle Williams from this action; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/17/2018. (ljb)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?