Paxton v. Rouse et al
Barry Paxton |
T Rouse, Michelle Grey, Angela West, Harris and John Does |
5:2018cv00032 |
February 8, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Jefferson |
J. Leon Holmes |
J. Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 JUDGMENT: Consistent with 30 Order that was entered on this day, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/29/2019. (ljb) |
Filing 13 ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety 10 Recommendation as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 3 Paxton's motion to dismiss Angela West and she is dismissed without prejudice as a defendant in this lawsuit; allowing P axton to proceed with his retaliatory transfer claim against Grey, in her individual capacity only; directing the Clerk to prepare a summons for Grey and the United States Marshal to serve the complaint, brief in support, amended complaint, statement of necessity, and this Order on Grey without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor; dismissing without prejudice all other claims raised in the complaint and amended complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/10/2018. (ljb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.