Crowley v. Musclewhite et al
Plaintiff: Mark Daniel Crowley
Defendant: Musclewhite, Budnik, Vernon Robertson, Nelson, Gloria A Smith, Isaac Wade, Crystal Woods, Darryl James, Lola L Elliot and Doe
Case Number: 5:2018cv00122
Filed: May 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Pine Bluff Office
County: Lincoln
Presiding Judge: Patricia S. Harris
Presiding Judge: James M. Moody
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 149 JUDGMENT: On oral motion of Plaintiff, this case is dismissed with prejudice. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 09/22/2021. (llg)
March 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 125 ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety 122 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; granting in part and denying in part 80 defendants' motion for summary judgment; dismiss ing with prejudice Crowley's claims against defendants Musslewhite, Budnik, Robertson, and Nelson; and dismissing with prejudice Crowley's claims against defendant Smith arising from the 2/8/2018 attack. Crowley's claims against defendant Smith in her personal capacity arising from the 11/20/2017 and the 2/17/2018 attacks will be set for trial. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 3/17/2020. (ljb)
January 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety 62 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 40 defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; dismissing without prejudice Crowley's claims against defendants James, Woods, Elliot, and Wade; and dismissing without prejudice any other claims. Crowley's failure-to-protect claims against defendants Musselwhite, Budnik, Robertson, Nelson, and Smith remain. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/8/2019. (ljb)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER Adopting 39 Partial Report and Recommendations. Crowley's claims against the Doe defendant are dismissed. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 8/14/2018. (mcz)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crowley v. Musclewhite et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Daniel Crowley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Musclewhite
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Budnik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vernon Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gloria A Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Isaac Wade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crystal Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darryl James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lola L Elliot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?