Tollison v. Asbestos Corp, Ltd

Plaintiff: R T Tollison
Defendant: Asbestos Corporation, Ltd.
Case Number: 1:1992cv01065
Filed: May 18, 1992
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: El Dorado Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge: Jimm Larry Hendren
Nature of Suit: Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 29, 2009 6 Opinion or Order of the Court TRANSFER ORDER transferring case to District of Eastern Pennsylvania. Signed by Judge Eduardo C. Robreno on April 13, 2009. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment 1 - Case List, # 2 Attachment 2 - Amended Administratiave Order No. 11, # 3 Attachment 3 - Administrative Order No. 12)(cnn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tollison v. Asbestos Corp, Ltd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R T Tollison
Represented By: Edward O. Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Asbestos Corporation, Ltd.
Represented By: William L. Owen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.