Temple v. Bancinsure, Inc.

Plaintiff: David V Temple
Defendant: Bancinsure, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2010cv01059
Filed: August 19, 2010
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: El Dorado Office
County: Bradley
Presiding Judge: Harry F. Barnes
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 31, 2013 34 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 32 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on May 31, 2013. (cap)
September 25, 2012 31 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT: granting defendant's 21 Motion for summary judgment; Case terminated. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on September 25, 2012. (cnn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Temple v. Bancinsure, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David V Temple
Represented By: Charles D. Skip Davidson, Sr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bancinsure, Inc.
Represented By: Junius Bracy Cross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?