Georgia Pacific, LLC v. Vescom Corporation
Plaintiff:
Georgia Pacific, LLC
Defendant:
Vescom Corporation
Case Number:
1:2013cv01013
Filed:
February 19, 2013
Court:
Arkansas Western District Court
Office:
El Dorado Office
County:
Ashley
Presiding Judge:
Susan O. Hickey
Nature of Suit:
Contract: Other
Cause of Action:
28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By:
Both
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
October 3, 2013 | 21 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Georgia Pacific, LLC v. Vescom Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Vescom Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Georgia Pacific, LLC | |
Represented By: | Carter C. Stein |
Represented By: | Samuel E. Ledbetter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.