Newman v. Norris, CORR AR

Case Number: 2:2005cv02107
Filed: July 20, 2005
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Fort Smith Office
Presiding Judge: Robert T. Dawson
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 18, 2015 112 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 109 Motion to Dismiss and the petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on February 18, 2015. (rw)
March 16, 2009 101 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 100 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on March 16, 2009. (lw)
February 3, 2009 99 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that (1) the unexhausted claims should be and hereby dismissed and that (2) the remainder of the claims should be and hereby are stayed on two conditions: (a) that petitioner affirmatively seek relief on his unexhausted c laims with the State of Arkansas within 30 days of the date of this Order, and (b) that petitioner act with 30 days of the full exhaustion of the dismissed claims at the State level to seek to have the stay lifted by the Court on the remaining claims. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on February 3, 2009. (rw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newman v. Norris, CORR AR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?