Fields v. Sharum et al

Plaintiff: Marcus Fields
Defendant: J Michael Fitzhugh, Timothy Sharum, Kris Deason, Stephen Tabor and Times Record Newspaper
Case Number: 2:2011cv02108
Filed: June 7, 2011
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Fort Smith Office
County: U.S., Outside State
Presiding Judge: Robert T. Dawson
Referring Judge: James R. Marschewski
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 5, 2011 22 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in its entirety. Accordingly 19 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on December 5, 2011. (lw)
November 2, 2011 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and adopting Report and Recommendations in it's entirety. The Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE on the grounds that Plaintiff fails to state claims on which re lief can be granted. Further Plaintiff has named defendants who are immune from suit or who are not state actors and has made no official capacity claims without alleging any policy, custom, or practice for official capacity liability. Finally this dismissal is considered a "strike" pursuant to the "three strikes" provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and the U.S. District Clerk is directed to appropriately flag this case. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on November 2, 2011. (lw)
June 7, 2011 6 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER transferring case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas and ordering the Clerk to immediately transfer plaintiff's entire case file to that Court. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 6/7/11. (kpr)[Transferred from ared on 6/7/2011.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fields v. Sharum et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J Michael Fitzhugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Sharum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kris Deason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen Tabor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Times Record Newspaper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcus Fields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?