Gilbreath et al v. Sunbeam Products, Inc.
Dana Gilbreath and Glen Gilbreath |
Sunbeam Products, Inc. |
2:2012cv02142 |
June 27, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Fort Smith Office |
Logan |
P. K. Holmes |
Property Damage Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 ORDER granting Plaintiff's Motion 58 and Plaintiffs' cause of action is hereby Dismissed with Prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The Clerk is directed to unconsolidate the cases, all pleadings and other documents in Trusty, et al v. Sunbeam Products, Inc are to be filed under case no. 2:13cv2039. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on January 21, 2014. (lw) Modified on 1/21/2014 to edit text (lw). |
Filing 26 ORDER; that the Gilbreaths pay Sunbeam $1,628.00 in attorney's fees incurred in making 22 MOTION to Compel. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 14, 2013. (lw) |
Filing 24 ORDER GRANTING 22 Motion to Compel. Plaintiffs are to respond to Defendant's discovery requests by 5:00 p.m. on August 7, 2013. Defendant is directed to file an affidavit in regard to fees and expenses by July 31, 2013. Refer to the order for further court requirements. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on July 24, 2013. 22 Motion to Appoint Receiver TERMINATED - filed in error. (jas) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting 17 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on April 18, 2013. (lw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.