Radcliff v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

Plaintiff: Vanessa Dawn Radcliff
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Case Number: 2:2012cv02189
Filed: August 21, 2012
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Fort Smith Office
County: Johnson
Referring Judge: Erin L. Setser
Presiding Judge: P. K. Holmes
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 21, 2013 11 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE and Plaintiffs case is dismissed with prejudice, and adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as set forth in the 9 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 21, 2013. (sh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Radcliff v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vanessa Dawn Radcliff
Represented By: Iva Nell Gibbons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?