Smith v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 22, 2014
ORDER adopting 25 Report and Recommendations in their entirety and granting 22 Motion for Attorney Fees in the amount of $4,096.50. This amount should be paid in addition to, and not out of, any past due benefits which plaintiff may be awarded in the future. Further, any EAJA award by this Court should be made payable to plaintiff, but may be mailed to plaintiff's counsel. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 22, 2014. (rw)
|April 23, 2014
JUDGMENT REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER AND REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on April 23, 2014. (lw)
|July 2, 2013
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 8 in toto and denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and plaintiff is directed to pay the filing fee of $400.00 by August 2, 2013. Should Plaintiff fail to comply by the deadline his complaint may be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on July 2, 2013. (sh)
|April 26, 2013
ORDER re 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis MOTION for Service directing the Plaintiff to submit an amended IFP application providing more specific information regarding all his sources of income, and further directed to file his amended IFP application by May 10, 2013. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on April 26, 2013. (sh)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?