Moore v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 2, 2014
ORDER adopting 21 Report and Recommendations in their entirety and granting 18 Motion for Attorney Fees in the amount of $3373.50. This amount should be paid in addition to, and not out of, any past due benefits which plaintiff may be aw arded in the future. Further, any EAJA award by this Court should be made payable to plaintiff and not counsel; in addition to, and not out of, any past due benefits which plaintiff may be awarded in the future. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on September 2, 2014. (rw)
|June 2, 2014
JUDGMENT REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER AND REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as set forth in the 15 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on June 2, 2014. (rw)
|July 25, 2013
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Service and DIRECTING SERVICE on Social Security Administration Commissioner. The plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of the complaint and this order on the defendant by certified mail, return receipt requested, as we ll as the US Attorney General and US Attorney for Western District/Arkansas without prepayment of fees and costs. Defendant is to answer within 60 days from the date of service.; granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on July 25, 2013. (sh)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?