Bogart et al v. Biggs
Seth Bogart, Braeden Rofkahr and Jonathan Esquivel |
Corey Biggs |
2:2020cv02033 |
March 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
P K Holmes |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Corey Biggs and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (hnc) |
Filing 4 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested as to Corey Biggs for service of the following document: #3 Complaint,. (Sanford, Josh) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Corey Biggs ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AARWDC-2103115), filed by Seth Bogart, Jonathan Esquivel, Braeden Rofkahr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent to Join -- Seth Bogart, #2 Exhibit Consent to Join -- Jonathan Esquivel, #3 Exhibit Consent to Join -- Braden Rofkahr)(Sanford, Josh) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (hnc) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Seth Bogart, Jonathan Esquivel, Braeden Rofkahr. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day your case may be terminated. (hnc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.