Finney v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Plaintiff: Ervin Finney
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Case Number: 2:2020cv02190
Filed: October 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Mark E Ford
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2020 Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ORDER that the matter has been provisionally filed as the undersigned finds that additional information is needed to rule on Plaintiff's IFP application. Specifically, the Court requires the following information: Plaintiff has indicated that he/she receives income from multiple sources but has failed to provide information concerning those sources on his IFP application. It is also unclear whether the $3,600.00 annual income he has reported includes all sources of income. Additionally, Plaintiff has reported one dependent but has failed to indicate this dependent's relationship to him/her. If the dependent is under the age of 18, Plaintiff is reminded that the dependent's name must be redacted to initials only. All of the above information is required before the Court can rule on the Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed to file an Amended IFP Application on or before November 9, 2020. Failure to comply within the time period specified could result in summary dismissal for failure to obey a court order. Signed by Honorable Mark E. Ford on October 20, 2020. (cla)
October 20, 2020 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , MOTION for Service by Ervin Finney. (Caddell, Fred)
October 20, 2020 Filing 4 CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT to U.S. Magistrate Judge by Ervin Finney. Government consent acknowledged pursuant to Standing Consent Letter. (Caddell, Fred)
October 20, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DIRECT ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This case has been assigned to a U.S. Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings and for entry of a final judgment. You must file the attached form memorializing consent or requesting reassignment to a District Judge within fourteen (14) days. Consent or Reassignment form due by 11/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent/Reassignment Form)(jlm)
October 20, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration Commissioner, filed by Ervin Finney.(Caddell, Fred)
October 20, 2020 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Ervin Finney. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day your case may be terminated. (jlm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Finney v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ervin Finney
Represented By: Fred L. Caddell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration Commissioner
Represented By: Office of Regional Counsel-Dallas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?