Gulley v. Mountain Home, Arkansas, City of

Case Number: 3:2007cv03062
Filed: December 7, 2007
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Harrison Office
Presiding Judge: Jimm Larry Hendren
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 9, 2009 100 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT in favor of Mountain Home, Arkansas, City of against Denver Gulley on interrogatories. This matter is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on April 9, 2009. (lw)
April 6, 2009 92 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 44 Motion in Limine; granting 46 Motion in Limine; granting 49 Motion in Limine; granting 51 Motion in Limine; withdrawing 75 Motion in Limine; denying 79 Motion in Limine; taking under advisement pending the conclusion of the trial 81 Motion for Protective Order; denying 86 Motion to Quash; denying 89 Motion to Quash; and granting 22 Motion in Limine. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on April 6, 2009. (lw)
February 24, 2009 73 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER; finds 67 Motion to Quash should be, and it hereby is, denied as moot. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on February 24, 2009. (lw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gulley v. Mountain Home, Arkansas, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?