Berryville AR, City of v. Latter Day Saints

Plaintiff: Berryville AR, City of
Defendant: Latter Day Saints
Case Number: 3:2008cv03041
Filed: July 9, 2008
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Real Property: Other Office
County: Carroll
Presiding Judge: Jimm Larry Hendren
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1442 Petition for Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 13, 2009 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 18 joint Motion for Disbursement and Dismissal and that the clerk of court transmit a copy of this Order to the Circuit Clerk of Carroll County, Arkansas; further case is dismissed with prejudice. (cc: Circuit Clerk of Carroll Co., AR) Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on May 13, 2009. (rw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berryville AR, City of v. Latter Day Saints
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Berryville AR, City of
Represented By: Charles Scott Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Latter Day Saints
Represented By: Robert K. Rhoads
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?