Wills v. Mountain Home, Arkansas, City of et al
| Martin Wills |
| Roger Morgan, State of Arkansas, The, State of Arkansas 14th Judicial District Prosecutor Office, Ron Kincade, Christopher Carter, Michael Kelly, Janet Faye Lacefield, Mountain Home Arkansas Prosecutor Office, City of, Mountain Home, Arkansas, City of, Mountain Home Police Department, City of, Carry Manuel and Robert Harden |
| 3:2012cv03090 |
| July 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Harrison Office |
| Baxter |
| P. K. Holmes |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
134
JUDGMENT. CASE IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 30, 2013. Copy of Judgment mailed to non CM/ECF participant. (jas)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER DENYING 125 Motion to Compel and DENYING 127 Sealed Emergency Motion. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 27, 2013. Copy of order mailed to non-CM/ECF participant. (jas)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER GRANTING 90 Motion to Quash as Construed filed by Janet Faye Lacefield. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on July 25, 2013. (jas)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER; that all pending motions are resolved as set forth. Further the following parties are terminated, Christopher Carter, Ron Kincade, The State of Arkansas and Roger Morgan. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on June 12, 2013. (lw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
