Computer Automation Systems, Inc. v. Intelutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Computer Automation Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Intelutions, Inc.
Case Number:
3:2012cv03146
Filed:
November 16, 2012
Court:
Arkansas Western District Court
Office:
Harrison Office
County:
Baxter
Presiding Judge:
P. K. Holmes
Nature of Suit:
Copyright
Cause of Action:
17:101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
February 8, 2013 | 32 |
![]() |
January 25, 2013 | 25 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Computer Automation Systems, Inc. v. Intelutions, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Computer Automation Systems, Inc. | |
Represented By: | John Earle Tull, III |
Represented By: | Everett Clarke Tucker, IV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Intelutions, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.