Brown v. Moore et al
||Daniel Ray Brown
||Mike Moore, Jason Day, Mandy Jones, Danny Hickman, Ryan Watson and Bob King
||May 7, 2013
||Arkansas Western District Court
||James R. Marschewski
||P. K. Holmes
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 28, 2013
ORDER denying 8 Motion of Judgment; denying 9 Motion of Judgment; denying 12 Motion for Entry of Default; denying 15 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 21 Motion for Recusal; denying 31 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 32 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 35 Motion for Order; denying as moot 26 Motion/Questions for the Court. Granting 11 Motion to Amend complaint, Plaintiff is given until 11/13/13 to file an amended complaint and directs the clerk to mai l plaintiff a court-approved 1983 form. Granting 17 Motion for Leave to File out of time, Defendants have until 11/6/13 to file their answer and are reminded they were directed in document 3 to provide the Court with a current address and phone number of Former Sheriff Danny Hickman. Further granting 36 Motion to Strike, the clerk is directed to strike document 28 and directing 14 Clerk's Entry of Default, be set aside. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on October 28, 2013. (lw)
|March 18, 2015
ORDER ADOPTING 64 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. Bob King and Ryan Watson terminated. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on March 18, 2015. (tg)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.