West v. Jackson et al
| Beverley West |
| Circuit Court of Carroll County and Circuit Judge Charles Scott Jackson |
| 3:2019cv03062 |
| August 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Timothy L Brooks |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER; that Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and #3 Motion for IFP status is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on August 15, 2019. (lw)
|
| Filing 5 MOTIONS REFERRED to Honorable Mark E. Ford: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis MOTION for Service filed by Beverley West. Motion no longer referred to Honorable Erin L. Wiedemann.(src) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form furnished and mailed to plaintiff. (lgd) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, MOTION for Service by Beverley West. (lgd) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Circuit Court of Carroll County, Charles Scott Jackson, filed by Beverley West.(lgd) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Beverley West. (lgd) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED to Honorable Erin L. Wiedemann: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis MOTION for Service filed by Beverley West. Motions referred to Honorable Erin L. Wiedemann.(lgd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
