Cox v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
| Larry Cox |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv03018 |
| April 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Timothy L Brooks |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Read, Nathan) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Hearing set for 6/15/2021 01:30 PM in Fayetteville -- 5th flr (Rm 509) before Honorable Timothy L. Brooks. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/14/2021. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on April 12, 2021. (slc) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Read, Nathan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Colt D. Galloway on behalf of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Galloway, Colt) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #3 Complaint with Jury Demand by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc..(Read, Nathan) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form furnished. (lgd) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., filed by Larry Cox.(lgd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (lgd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Searcy County Circuit Court, case number 65CV-21-8., filed by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court complaint)(lgd) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Notice of Removal #1 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorney(s), who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: Colt Galloway. (lgd) |
| Notice of Removal filing fee paid re #1 Notice of Removal : $ 402, receipt number AARWDC-2362260.. (Read, Nathan) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING FILING FEE. The following document was received and filed without the appropriate filing fee: #1 Notice of Removal. You MUST pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 or file a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis, if appropriate, within 2 business days.If the proper fees or motion are not received for case initiating documents, your case may be subject to dismissal.Present your payment to the appropriate Divisional Office or Pay Online, using the Civil -> Other Documents -> Filing Fee Submitted event. Filing Fee due by 4/5/2021 (lgd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cox v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Larry Cox | |
| Represented By: | James Monroe Scurlock |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Colt D. Galloway |
| Represented By: | Nathan Andrew Read |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
