Keener v. Domtar Industries, Inc.

Plaintiff: Kenneth Keener
Defendant: Domtar Industries, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2007cv04081
Filed: September 7, 2007
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Texarkana Office
County: out-of-state
Presiding Judge: Jimm Larry Hendren
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 22, 2009 37 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 35 Motion for Reconsideration and Review. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on May 22, 2009. (cnn)
May 1, 2009 33 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT granting 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment in favor of Defendant and dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on May 1, 2009. (cap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keener v. Domtar Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Keener
Represented By: Thomas H. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Domtar Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?