Williams v. Living Hope Southeast, LLC et al
| Renee S Williams |
| Maxwell Dean Hill, Sr. |
| US Trustee |
| Living Hope Southwest Medical Services, LLC |
| 4:2009cv04067 |
| March 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Texarkana Office |
| Miller |
| Harry F. Barnes |
| Withdrawal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER granting 1 Motion to Withdraw Reference as to the Plaintiff/Trustee's claims against Defendant Maxwell Dean Hill, Sr., along with any defenses to those claims raised by Hill, and court withdraws reference to the US Bankruptcy Court those claims against Defendant Maxwell Dean Hill, Sr., for actual fraud (Count II), constructive fraud (Count III) and default on loan (Count IV) raised by Plaintiff/Trustee in her Second Amended Complaint; granting 4 Motion for Partial Remand; granting 10 Motion for Partial Remand; accordingly, all other claims (Counts I, V, VI, and VII) raised in Plaintiff/Trustee's Second Amended Complaint are remanded to US Bankruptcy Court. David Kimbro Stephens, Mike Grundy and Living Hope Southeast, LLC terminated as defendants. Signed by Honorable Harry F. Barnes on June 24, 2009. (cap) (certified copy sent to Bankruptcy Clerk and copy faxed to Judge Mixon) Modified on 6/24/2009 to add text (cap).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
