Mercer v. Martin et al
Todd H. Mercer |
Danny Martin, Patricia Franklin and Miller |
4:2015cv04052 |
June 11, 2015 |
US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Texarkana Office |
Nevada |
Barry A. Bryant |
Susan O. Hickey |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 ORDER Granting IFP, directing Clerk to assess filing fee and collect funds from Prison Account of Todd H. Mercer. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on August 30, 2016. (mll) |
Filing 54 JUDGMENT granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on August 8, 2016. (mll) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting 28 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 29 Motion to Compel; denying 32 Motion to Compel. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on March 2, 2016. (mll) |
Filing 27 ORDER denying 22 Motion to Issue Order; granting 23 Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Re-Issue Order; granting 26 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Nicholas Rudolph Windle withdrawn and the Clerk of Court is directed to remove his name from the list of attorneys who receive Notices of Electronic Filing in this case. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on January 7, 2016. (mll) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion for Order to Subpoena Documents. See Order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Barry A. Bryant on October 1, 2015. (mll) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.