Bazzelle v. Compasspointe Healthcare System
Plaintiff: Diana Bazzelle
Defendant: Compasspointe Healthcare System
Case Number: 4:2015cv04088
Filed: September 14, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Office: Texarkana Office
County: Nevada
Presiding Judge: Susan O. Hickey
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 JUDGMENT in favor of defendant Compasspointe Healthcare System against plaintiff Diana Bazzelle; granting 20 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings; Case Dismissed with Prejudice. Signed by Honorable Susan O. Hickey on November 18, 2016. (cnn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bazzelle v. Compasspointe Healthcare System
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diana Bazzelle
Represented By: Julius D. Kearney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Compasspointe Healthcare System
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?