Riley v. Jones et al
Michael Edward Riley |
Special Agent John Jones, Investigator Jake Eudy and Chief Deputy Joey Davis |
4:2024cv04130 |
December 20, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
Barry A Bryant |
Susan O Hickey |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***TEXT ONLY ENTRY FOR ECF PURPOSES ONLY. (mjm) |
TEXT ONLY CLERK'S ORDER OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT to a District Judge. Case reassigned to presiding judge Honorable Susan O. Hickey and Honorable Barry A Bryant as the referral judge.(mll) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF DIRECT ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE directed to Defendant(s). This case has been assigned to a U.S. Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings and for entry of a final judgment. You must return the attached form memorializing consent or requesting reassignment to a District Judge within twenty-one (21) days. Consent or Reassignment form due by 2/28/2025. (mbm) |
Filing 10 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Joey Davis, Jake Eudy, John Jones and USM285 Form(s) Delivered to USMS for each defendant for whom summons was issued with the following documents attached: re #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint (42:1983), filed by Michael Edward Riley; #1 Complaint (42:1983). (mbm) |
![]() |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint (42:1983), filed by Michael Edward Riley. See R&R for details. Objections to R&R due by 2/24/2025. Signed by Honorable Barry A Bryant on February 7, 2025. (mbm) |
![]() |
Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ORDER denying #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. A civil litigant does not have a constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in a civil action but the Court may appoint counsel at its discretion. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1). The Court has considered the need for an attorney, the likelihood that Plaintiff will benefit from assistance of counsel, the factual and legal complexity of the case, and whether Plaintiff has the ability to investigate and present this case. In considering these factors, the Court finds that the claims do not appear legally or factually complex, and Plaintiff is adequately prosecuting this case at this time. The Court finds Plaintiff is capable of prosecuting his claims without appointed counsel. At a later stage in the case, Plaintiff may again request appointment of counsel if Plaintiff believes the circumstances justify such an appointment. Signed by Honorable Barry A Bryant on January 24, 2025. (awl) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Michael Edward Riley. (ria) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DIRECT ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE. This case has been assigned to a U.S. Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings and for entry of a final judgment. You must return the attached form memorializing consent or requesting reassignment to a District Judge within twenty-one (21) days. Consent or Reassignment form due by 1/10/2025. (bjb) |
![]() |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983), MOTION for Service by Michael Edward Riley. (bjb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (42:1983) against 9th West Judicial Circuit Court, 9th West Judicial Drug Task Force, Aaron Brassel, Bryan Chesshir, Tom Cooper, Joey Davis, Jake Eudy, Howard County Detention Center, Howard County Sheriff's Office, John Jones, Bryan McJunkins, Jana Tallent, filed by Michael Edward Riley.(bjb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.