Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Valueclick, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Defendant:
VC E-Commerce Solutions, Inc. and Valueclick, Inc.
Case Number:
5:2005cv05189
Filed:
November 22, 2005
Court:
Arkansas Western District Court
Office:
Fayetteville Office
County:
Benton
Presiding Judge:
Robert T. Dawson
Nature of Suit:
Trademark
Cause of Action:
15:1051 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| March 24, 2006 | 9 |
REPORT on the determination of an action re Trademark. See attached document for specifics. Copy of Judgment mailed to Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks (mfr)
|
| March 23, 2006 | 6 |
MOTION for Judgment Consent Judgment by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Hutchinson, W.)
|
| March 22, 2006 | 5 |
ORDER granting plaintiff's 4 Motion to Extend time to effect service. Allowing plaintiff until 4/21/06 to serve defendants. Signed by Judge Robert T. Dawson on March 22, 2006. (ct)
|
| March 21, 2006 | 4 |
MOTION to Extend Time by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Hutchinson, W.)
|
| March 9, 2006 | 3 | |
| November 23, 2005 | 2 |
REPORT on the filing or determination of an action re TRADEMARK See attached document for specifics. Copy of complaint mailed to Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks (ct)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
