Bunch v. Craig et al
| 5:2006cv05220 |
| November 17, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Fayetteville Office |
| Jimm Larry Hendren |
| James R. Marschewski |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 71 Report and Recommendations, dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on May 1, 2009. (src)
|
|
Filing
71
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Henry J. Bunch. Objections to R&R due by 4/16/2009. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on March 30, 2009. (tg)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 31 Motion to Strike ; ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER REFERRING CASE to Honorable James R. Marschewski; Nathaniel R. Coy and Thomas E. Reed terminated. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on September 18, 2008. Motions referred to James R. Marschewski.(tg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bunch v. Craig et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
