Chappell v. Helder et al
| Daniel A. Chappell |
| Timothy Helder and Washington County, Arkansas |
| 5:2007cv05219 |
| December 3, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Fayetteville Office |
| Washington |
| Jimm Larry Hendren |
| James R. Marschewski |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
JUDGMENT in favor of Daniel A. Chappell against Washington County, Arkansas, Timothy Helder, ORDER ADOPTING 40 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and directing Washington County Detention Center to file proposed revised policies by 3/22/2010. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on March 1, 2010. (src)
|
|
Filing
40
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint Referred (42:1983) filed by Daniel A. Chappell. Objections to R&R due by 12/31/2009. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on December 14, 2009. (tg)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations 26 . ORDER REFERRING CASE to Honorable James R. Marschewski. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on March 23, 2009. Motions referred to James R. Marschewski.(src)
|
|
Filing
26
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 15 First MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Timothy Helder, Washington County, Arkansas. Objections to R&R due by 3/19/2009. Signed by Honorable James R. Marschewski on February 25, 2009. (tg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
