Transplace Stuttgart, LP v. Zahava Group, Inc.

Plaintiff: Transplace Stuttgart, LP
Defendant: Zahava Group, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2012cv05224
Filed: October 9, 2012
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Fayetteville Office
County: U.S., Outside State
Presiding Judge: Jimm Larry Hendren
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 20, 2013 15 Opinion or Order of the Court DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Transplace Stuttgart, LP against Zahava Group, Inc. in the amount of $214,600.91 with court costs in the amount of $4,174.81 and interest at the rate of 0.15% per annum until paid. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on February 20, 2013. (tg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Transplace Stuttgart, LP v. Zahava Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zahava Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Transplace Stuttgart, LP
Represented By: Christy Comstock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?