George v. Kiewit Infrastructure South Co.
Plaintiff: Patrick George
Defendant: Kiewit Infrastructure South Co.
Case Number: 5:2015cv05169
Filed: July 23, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Office: Fayetteville Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: P. K. Holmes
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 OPINION AND ORDER denying 17 Motion for Summary Judgment, as set forth. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on May 16, 2016. (jas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: George v. Kiewit Infrastructure South Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick George
Represented By: Cindy L. Hawkins
Represented By: Jeff L. Slaton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kiewit Infrastructure South Co.
Represented By: Jeffrey W Puryear
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?