Moore v. Apple Central, LLC

Plaintiff: Megan Moore
Defendant: Apple Central, LLC
Case Number: 5:2016cv05069
Filed: March 18, 2016
Court: Arkansas Western District Court
Office: Fayetteville Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: P. K. Holmes
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 8, 2017 15 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER, as set forth. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Apple Central, LLCs motion to dismiss Doc. 9 is HELD IN ABEYANCE to allow Plaintiff to amend her complaint. Any amended complaint must be filed by March 10, 2017. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on February 8, 2017. (rg) Modified text on 2/8/2017 (jas).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Apple Central, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan Moore
Represented By: Rick Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple Central, LLC
Represented By: Brandon B. Cate
Represented By: Kyle Burton Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?