Browne et al v. PAM Transport Inc et al
| David Browne, Antonio Caldwell and Lucretia Hall |
| PAM Transport Inc and John Does |
| 5:2016cv05366 |
| December 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Fayetteville Office |
| U.S., Outside State |
| Timothy L. Brooks |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
325
ORDER regarding final distribution of settlement funds. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on April 7, 2023. (Brooks, Timothy)
|
|
Filing
300
ORDER Granting 297 Motion For Final Approval of Class Action Settlement. See Order for specific details. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on July 31, 2020. (Brooks, Timothy)
|
|
Filing
259
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION AND ORDER on the calculation of damages for the minimum wage claims relating to 160 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Lucretia Hall, Antonio Caldwell, David Browne, 216 Opinion and Order, 219 Order, 244 Supplement, filed by PAM Transport Inc, John Does, and 245 Supplement filed by Lucretia Hall, Antonio Caldwell, David Browne. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on February 6, 2020. (src)
|
|
Filing
222
OPINION AND ORDER deferring ruling on 146 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 154 Motion to Modify Certification Order; denying 156 Motion to Decertify FLSA and Rule 23 Classes; denying 158 Motion to Dismiss Opt-Ins and granting in part and denying in part 213 Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment on the Claims of Certain Opt-In Plaintiffs (see Order for specifics). Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on January 24, 2020. (tg)
|
|
Filing
216
OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 160 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and granting in part and denying in part 187 Motion to Strike. The Clerk is Directed to Strike parts of documents 157 167 and 205 . See order for specifics. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on January 17, 2020. (src) Modified on 1/17/2020 (src).
|
|
Filing
204
Memorandum Opinion and ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 151 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment based on Judicial Estoppel. NOTE: Per the Order, the Parties are directed to confer and file any supplemental briefing by no later than January 10, 2020. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on December 31, 2019. (Brooks, Timothy)
|
|
Filing
202
OPINION AND ORDER denying 198 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b). Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on December 30, 2019. (tg)
|
|
Filing
175
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 149 Motion to Exclude Expert Report (see Order for specifics). Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on December 16, 2019. (tg)
|
|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 84 Motion to Decertify Conditional Collective FLSA Action and granting 91 Motion to Certify Class. Parties must confer and then provide the Court with an agreed-to form of and plan for notice to class members by no later than 2/8/2019. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on January 25, 2019. (tg)
|
|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 55 Motion to Dismiss and denying 56 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on October 19, 2018. (tg)
|
|
Filing
80
OPINION AND ORDER denying 65 Motion to Strike (See for specifics). Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on October 16, 2018. (tg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
