Martinez-Nolan v. Tyson Sales and Distributions, Inc.
| Phillip Martinez-Nolan |
| Tyson Sales and Distributions, Inc. |
| 5:2020cv05082 |
| May 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Timothy L Brooks |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 TEXT ONLY Minute Entry for proceedings held before Honorable Timothy L. Brooks: Case Management Hearing held on 6/29/2020. (Paula Barden-Court Reporter) (slc) |
| Filing 9 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on June 16, 2020. (slc) |
| Filing 8 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Tyson Sales and Distributions, Inc.. (Graves, Kathlyn) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tyson Sales and Distributions, Inc.. (Graves, Kathlyn) |
| Filing 6 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Hearing set for 6/29/2020 01:30 PM in Fayetteville -- 5th flr (Rm 509) before Honorable Timothy L. Brooks. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/9/2020. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on May 5, 2020. (slc) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE: The following attorney(s) listed on Notice of Removal #1 is not registered for CM/ECF noticing and filing in the Western District of Arkansas:Lauren S. Grinder. An attorney can register through PACER for a CM/ECF login and password if they are admitted to practice in the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas or are admitted pro hac vice for this case. Any non-registered attorney should submit the proper attorney admission petition or file an appropriate motion. Please refer to our website http://www.arwd.uscourts.gov/attorney-information for further information. (lgd) |
| Filing 5 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (tg) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #3 Complaint with Jury Demand by Tyson Sales and Distributions, Inc..(tg) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed in State Court with Jury Demand against Tyson Sales and Distributions, Inc., filed by Phillip Martinez-Nolan.(tg) (Originally filed in state court.) Modified on 5/5/2020. (mll) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Tyson Sales and Distributions, Inc.. (tg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Benton County, Arkansas, case number 04CV-20-929. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 5007200), filed by Tyson Sales and Distributions, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Complaint)(tg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martinez-Nolan v. Tyson Sales and Distributions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tyson Sales and Distributions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kathlyn Graves |
| Represented By: | Lauren S. Grinder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Phillip Martinez-Nolan | |
| Represented By: | Matthew A. Kezhaya |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
