Bielema v. The Razorback Foundation, Inc.
| Bret A. Bielema |
| The Razorback Foundation, Inc. |
| 5:2020cv05104 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| P K Holmes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 33 REPLY to Response to Motion re #21 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by The Razorback Foundation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Ney, Marshall) |
| Filing 32 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #31 Motion for Leave to File a Reply. Defendant is ordered to immediately file the proposed reply attached as an exhibit to its motion. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on August 10, 2020. (rab) |
| Filing 31 MOTION for Leave to File a Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint by The Razorback Foundation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Reply)(Ney, Marshall) |
| Filing 30 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support Response to Motion to Dismiss by Bret A. Bielema. (Mars, Thomas) |
| Filing 29 TEXT ONLY ORDER re #28 Response to Motion filed by Bret A. Bielema. The response brief exceeds the limit of 25 substantive pages set out in the #14 initial scheduling order without leave of Court, and will not be considered as filed. An amended response brief may be filed by August 5, 2020. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on July 31, 2020. (rab) |
| Filing 28 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO Motion re #21 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by Bret A. Bielema. (Mars, Thomas) |
| Filing 27 RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO Motion re #21 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by Bret A. Bielema. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit MARS LETTER TO NEY)(Mars, Thomas) |
| Filing 26 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bret A. Bielema. The Razorback Foundation, Inc. served on 7/21/2020, answer due 8/11/2020. (Culpepper, Ryan) |
| Filing 25 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to The Razorback Foundation, Inc. and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (lgd) |
| Filing 24 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested as to The Razorback Foundation, Inc. for service of the following document: #19 Amended Complaint,. (Culpepper, Ryan) |
| Filing 23 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by The Razorback Foundation, Inc.. (Ney, Marshall) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE regarding Proof of Service directed to Plaintiff Bret A. Bielema. The docket does not reflect summons issued or that proof of service has been filed. The Plaintiff is directed to file proof of service, or a statement as to when such proof will be filed, within five (5) days of the filing of this Notice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). Proof of Service due by 7/21/2020. (src) |
| Filing 22 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support of #21 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by The Razorback Foundation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Ney, Marshall) |
| Filing 21 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by The Razorback Foundation, Inc.. (Ney, Marshall) |
| Filing 20 TEXT ONLY ORDER finding as moot #12 Motion to Dismiss. The amended complaint supersedes the original complaint and moots the motion to dismiss the original complaint. Defendant's motion is terminated without prejudice to the filing of a subsequent motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on July 6, 2020. (rab) |
| Filing 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand as to #2 Complaint, against The Razorback Foundation, Inc. , filed by Bret A. Bielema. Related document: #2 Complaint, filed by Bret A. Bielema. (Attachments: #1 EXHIBIT 1, #2 EXHIBIT 2, #3 EXHIBIT 3, #4 EXHIBIT 4, #5 EXHIBIT 5)(Mars, Thomas) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Blake Brizzolara on behalf of The Razorback Foundation, Inc.. (Brizzolara, Blake) |
| Filing 17 TEXT ONLY ORDER re #14 Initial Scheduling Order. The deadline to confer under Rule 26(f) set out in the initial scheduling order is extended to 21 days after entry of an order on the pending #12 motion to dismiss, and a report must be filed within 7 days of that meeting. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on June 28, 2020. (rab) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Church Campbell on behalf of The Razorback Foundation, Inc.. (Campbell, Katherine) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert W. George on behalf of The Razorback Foundation, Inc.. (George, Robert) |
| Filing 14 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/3/2020. Jury Trial set for 6/1/2021 09:00 AM in Fayetteville - 2nd flr (Rm 210) before Honorable P. K. Holmes III. Signed by Jane Ann Short, Courtroom Deputy for Honorable P. K. Holmes III on June 26, 2020. (jas) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM BRIEF in Support Motion to Dismiss by The Razorback Foundation, Inc.. (Ney, Marshall) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss by The Razorback Foundation, Inc.. (Ney, Marshall) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by John Earle Tull, III on behalf of Bret A. Bielema. (Tull, John) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Craig Wood on behalf of Bret A. Bielema. (Wood, Robert) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Peter Abel on behalf of Bret A. Bielema. (Abel, Benjamin) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by John C. Everett on behalf of Bret A. Bielema. (Everett, John) |
| Filing 7 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Benjamin P. Abel is directed to immediately register for Pro Hac Vice filer access through PACER and enter his appearance in this matter. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on June 15, 2020. (jas) |
| Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. R. Craig Wood is directed to immediately register for Pro Hac Vice filer access through PACER and enter his appearance in this matter. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes III on June 15, 2020. (jas) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Attorney Benjamin P. Abel to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Application fee paid $ 100; receipt number AARWDC-2160330) by Bret A. Bielema. (Culpepper, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Attorney R. Craig Wood to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Application fee paid $ 100; receipt number AARWDC-2160325) by Bret A. Bielema. (Culpepper, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (tg) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against The Razorback Foundation, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AARWDC-2159343), filed by Bret A. Bielema. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Coach Bielema's Employment Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2 - First Amendment to Coach Bielema's Employment Agreement, #3 Exhibit 3 - 2012 Buyout Agreement, #4 Exhibit 4 - 2015 Buyout Agreement, #5 Exhibit 5 - Final Buyout Agreement)(Culpepper, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Bret A. Bielema. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day your case may be terminated. (tg) |
| TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE re Multiple Attorneys Listed on Pleading directed to Plaintiff Bret A. Bielema. Complaint, #2 lists multiple attorneys appearing for the filer. The following attorney(s), who did not sign the pleading, must enter a separate Notice of Appearance in order to receive electronic notification of future activity in the case: R. Craig Wood, John C. Everett, Benjamin P. Abel and John Tull. (tg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
