Shelby v. Bentonville Police Department
Plaintiff: Matthew Shelby
Defendant: Bentonville Police Department, Detective Kris Moffit, David Townsend, Mike Stegall and Detective Joshua Woodhams
Case Number: 5:2021cv05203
Filed: November 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Timothy L Brooks
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2021 Filing 14 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Hearing set for 2/1/2022 03:00 PM in Fayetteville -- 5th flr (Rm 509) before Honorable Timothy L. Brooks. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/24/2022. Signed by Honorable Timothy L. Brooks on December 22, 2021. (slc)
December 16, 2021 Filing 13 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Matthew Shelby. Amendment to #10 Affidavit of Service, Stegall, Mike. (Newcomb, Robert)
December 15, 2021 Filing 12 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Kris Moffit, Mike Stegall, David Townsend, Joshua Woodhams.(Monaghan, Sara)
December 15, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Sara L. Monaghan on behalf of Kris Moffit, Mike Stegall, David Townsend, Joshua Woodhams. (Monaghan, Sara)
December 9, 2021 Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint/ Petition, filed by Matthew Shelby. Bentonville Police Department served on 12/2/2021, answer due 12/23/2021. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service, #2 Affidavit of Service, #3 Affidavit of Service)(Newcomb, Robert)
November 19, 2021 Filing 9 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Bentonville Police Department, Josh Woodhams, Mike Stegall, Kris Moffit, and David Townsend and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. YOU MUST PRINT THIS ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH IS THE MAIN DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (tg)
November 19, 2021 Filing 8 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form (tg)
November 19, 2021 Filing 7 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested for USA Agency, Corporation, Officers or Employees as to Josh Woodhams for service of the following document: #2 Complaint. (Newcomb, Robert)
November 19, 2021 Filing 6 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested for USA Agency, Corporation, Officers or Employees as to Summons to Mike Stegall for service of the following document: #2 Complaint. (Newcomb, Robert)
November 19, 2021 Filing 5 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested for USA Agency, Corporation, Officers or Employees as to David Townsend for service of the following document: #2 Complaint. (Newcomb, Robert)
November 19, 2021 Filing 4 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested for USA Agency, Corporation, Officers or Employees as to Kris Moffit for service of the following document: #2 Complaint. (Newcomb, Robert)
November 19, 2021 Filing 3 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS. Summons Requested for USA Agency, Corporation, Officers or Employees as to Bentonville Police Department for service of the following document: #2 Complaint. (Newcomb, Robert)
November 19, 2021 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Matthew Shelby ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AARWDC-2499389), filed by Matthew Shelby.(Newcomb, Robert)
November 18, 2021 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET for case initiated by Matthew Shelby. Please proceed with filing your case initiating document(s).If the case initiating documents are not filed by Close of Business the next business day your case may be terminated. (tg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shelby v. Bentonville Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Shelby
Represented By: Robert A. Newcomb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bentonville Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detective Kris Moffit
Represented By: Sara L. Monaghan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Townsend
Represented By: Sara L. Monaghan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mike Stegall
Represented By: Sara L. Monaghan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detective Joshua Woodhams
Represented By: Sara L. Monaghan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?