Thornton v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
Plaintiff: Annie Thornton
Defendant: Tyson Foods, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2022cv05077
Filed: April 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Timothy L Brooks
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tyson Foods, Inc.. (Kim, Sul)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Sul A Kim on behalf of Tyson Foods, Inc.. (Kim, Sul)
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY CLERK'S ORDER re #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Tyson Foods, Inc., answer due 6/28/2022. (tg)
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 JOINT MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond To Complaint by Tyson Foods, Inc.. (DeLaney, Damien) Modified on 6/7/2022 (slc).
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Annie Thornton. Tyson Foods, Inc. served on 5/17/2022, answer due 6/7/2022. (Parmet, Matthew)
May 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE by Annie Thornton of Filing Consent (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent)(Parmet, Matthew)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE by Annie Thornton of Filing Consent (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Consent, #3 Exhibit 3 - Consent, #4 Exhibit 4 - Consent, #5 Exhibit 5 - Consent, #6 Exhibit 6 - Consent)(Parmet, Matthew)
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 THE DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED TO COURT USERS AND CASE PARTICIPANTS. Summons Issued as to Tyson Foods, Inc. and returned to attorney or plaintiff for service. (mjm)
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Magistrate Notice/Consent Form. (mjm)
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Tyson Foods, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number 2024326), filed by Annie Thornton.(mjm)
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Annie Thornton. (mjm)
April 22, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY CLERK'S NOTICE: The following attorney listed on Complaint #2 is not registered for CM/ECF noticing and filing in the Western District of Arkansas:Matthew S. Parmet. An attorney can register through PACER for a CM/ECF login and password if they are admitted to practice in the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas or are admitted pro hac vice for this case. Any non-registered attorney should submit the proper attorney admission petition or file an appropriate motion. Please refer to our website http://www.arwd.uscourts.gov/attorney-information for further information. (mjm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thornton v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annie Thornton
Represented By: Matthew S. Parmet
Represented By: Matthew Scott Parmet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tyson Foods, Inc.
Represented By: Damien DeLaney
Represented By: Sul A Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?